Revival of Hindu Rights

Sita Ram Goel, who was a prominent Indian historian, political activist and publisher known for his extensive work on Hindu nationalism and critiques of marxist and colonial interpretations of Indian history, said: “There are many Hindus who are legitimately proud of Hindu art, architecture, sculpture, music, painting, dance, drama, literature, linguistics, lexicography and so on. But they seldom take into account the fact that this great wealth of artistic, literary and scientific heritage will die if the Hindu society which created it is no longer there to preserve, protect and perpetuate it.”

It won’t take much time for the Hindu society to die either completely if we don’t put effort into protecting and perpetuating it by reviving Hindu rights. But before all this we must be clear about one thing – why is Hinduism so important?

It is very important as it is the only religion that adheres to Dharma. Nowadays Dharma is equated to religion but they are completely different. While religion is that which is built upon beliefs or doctrines regarded by followers as conducive to spiritual well-being, Dharma in short is anything that restores natural balance.

The opposite of Dharma, known as Adharma as a corollary, is anything that disturbs the natural balance. Thus, Dharma is that which sustains or preserves this creation.

According to Shatavadhani Dr. R. Ganesh,
“The literal meaning of Sanatana Dharma is ‘eternal sustainability’ and a reasonable approximation of the implied meaning is ‘ancient Indian way of life’ or even ‘Indian culture’, roughly speaking.”

The civilizations of Bharatavarsha operating under the principles of Sanatana Dharma have been civilizations that always keep trying to achieve balance or sustainability, says Pankaj Saxena in his book Svayambodha and Shatrubodha.

The Mahabharata defines Dharma as:
“Dharma supports everything; it bears everything and it is the foundation of everything.”

So Dharma balances social security and individual freedom, progress and conservation, hierarchy and equality, technology and culture, samskara and vairagya and many such opposites. In other words, Dharma is the dynamic balance of opposites and the principle of harmony.

Dharma is not only essential for Bharat but is needed by the whole world to sustain. When Dharma is needed by the whole world, it is obvious that Hinduism — which is the only religion that follows Dharma and has such a rich culture, heritage and history of 10000 years, making it the oldest living major religion in the world — is very much necessary for the world to sustain and balance.

Now the next question can be: Why is it said that semetic religions are not working for world peace and sustainability? On the contrary, they prioritise spreading their own beliefs and doctrines and imposing them.

This question can be answered by just looking through historical accounts — the amount of violence, hatred, destruction and despair that struck the world is recorded on every page of history.

In the semetic religion, the entirety of knowledge is contained inside “their” book and any “other” book or knowledge outside their book is considered an inspiration of the devil. To support this theory, it becomes not just important but necessary for them to reject any knowledge outside it as inspired by the devil and to not just reject it but also destroy the knowledge systems of all ancient Dharmic and pagan (non-Abrahamic) traditions.

The tragic events where great learning centres and libraries like Nalanda and Takshashila were left burning for months, and scholars and saints who propagated these knowledge systems were seen as sinners and killed along with the burning of their libraries. These libraries & monasteries stand as victims of their dogmatic violence.

It was not just limited to destruction of pagan knowledge systems, but even pagan ways of worship were targeted.

Hindu Dharma builds on the past. Semeticism declares the past as darkness to be forgotten. Hindus worship their ancestors. Semeticism assign them to hell for doing so.

To worship anyone else other than the one true God, is equivalent to worshipping a false god, so ancestor worship is also worship of false gods. One of the Abrahamic religion books shows a deep disrespect for ancestors:

“For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing, and they have no more reward, for the memory of them is forgotten. Their love and their hate and their envy have already perished and forever they have no more share in all that is done under the sun.”

They believed that pagans worshipped their ancestors only so that they could magically summon their spirits to do their chores, and in their universe apart from their Messiah, only demons came down to help human beings.

These are just 1% of the imposition and destruction by these religions. There was not only destruction of temples, structures and genocides of crores of pagans (including women and children), but it also led to the extinction of many local religions like Persian, Greek and Egyptian.

Even we had our own faiths and beliefs, but we never imposed our values or attacked or fought against anyone for religious reasons until we were attacked. We were broad-minded and accepted everyone as they were.

So this makes it clear that the basic designs of religions like the Abrahamic ones do not support or focus on sustainability and world peace.

Now let us think about how to revive Hindu rights as we have a clear answer for why we need Hinduism so badly in today’s times.

Talking about political rights

Abolition of Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991

There are advocacy groups that are actively seeking the abolition of this Act to allow the legal reclamation of historical temple sites, particularly in Kashi and Mathura.

The problem with this act is that:

This law is designed to freeze the religious status of all places of worship as they existed on the day of India’s independence, i.e., August 15, 1947. It prohibits changing a place of worship of one religious denomination into that of another, or even a different sect within the same religion.

This Act uses August 15, 1947 as an arbitrary and controversial cut-off date to freeze the status of religious sites. Opponents, primarily from Hindu, Jain, Buddhist and Sikh communities, argue that this date ignores centuries of alleged destruction and conversion of their places of worship by medieval invaders and denies them the opportunity to reclaim these sites through legal means.

This Act also bars judicial review as Section 4 prevents courts from hearing cases or initiating new proceedings regarding the character of a place of worship. Critics argue this violates a fundamental structure of the constitution, i.e., the right to access justice and a judicial remedy for grievances.

One of the prominent examples of the application of this law:

Gyanvapi Mosque, Varanasi

Hindu petitioners claim that it was built over an ancient temple and have sought the right to worship within the complex.

The other side argued that the suit is barred by the Places of Worship Act, which prohibits changing what is now “theirs” back into a temple.

The court’s interpretation in a landmark move ruled that the Act does not stop them from ascertaining the religious character of a site. This allowed a survey of the existing building to proceed despite the Act’s existence.

As of 2026, proceedings are on hold due to a Supreme Court order, but the case has already led to the discovery of objects claimed as Shivlinga by Hindus and a fountain by another community, deeply impacting community sentiments.

This is the case of many such underground Hindu temples over which other structures stand today.

Abolition of this act can help revive many more temples and Hindu articles of worship.

Freeing temples from State control

A major 2026 priority is the demand for the government to hand over temple management and assets to Hindu devotees, ending state-run administrative control on 90,000 to 1,00,000 temples, primarily in southern states like Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.

Critics argue that while other communities largely manage their own places of worship, have their own land boards for religious purposes etc, only Hindu temples are singled out for direct government control.

Arguments also demand that this system violates Articles 25 and 26 of the constitution which guarantee the right of religious denominations to manage their own affairs and property.

Major allegations include leakage of revenue. For instance, in Tamil Nadu activists claim that despite owning hundreds and thousands of acres of land, temples see only a fraction of expected rental income due to poor bureaucratic management.

Devotees object to temple surplus funds being diverted by secular governments for non-religious public welfare projects rather than temple maintenance or Hindu charitable activities.

One instance here shows why it is required to free temples from state control.

In states like Tamil Nadu where the HR and CE Department manages over 40,000 temples, several 2026 legal rulings have highlighted the failure of state officials to protect temple property.

In January 2026, the Madras High Court struck down a decades-old auction of temple land as illegal and arbitrary, restoring nearly 4 acres of land worth ₹110 crore to a temple.

In late 2025 and early 2026, the High Court repeatedly summoned HR and CE officials for their inaction in clearing large-scale encroachments on temple lands used by private entities and even other religious organisations.

Anti-conversion laws

It is prescribed that anti-conversion laws come into effect as these laws prohibit conversion by force, fraud, allurement (money/jobs) or marriage (“love trap”). They often require a 30-day advance notice to a district magistrate before converting.

While there is no such law nationwide, 12 states have enacted stringent “Freedom of Religion” Acts.

Example:

Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh (Jan 2026) – Police recently arrested 3 individuals for allegedly running an interstate conversion racket that used a vocational training centre as a cover to convert people using monetary incentives.

Following Uttarakhand’s implementation of UCC (Uniform Civil Code) in early 2025, there are widespread demands for a national UCC for national integration and promoting equality over religion-based laws.

Comparison with Pre-UCC laws

Matter Typical personal law UCC examples
Marriage age
Varies (e.g., puberty for some personal laws)
Uniformly 18 for women, 21 for men
Divorce
Religious modes (e.g: oral divorce by certain community)
Mandatory court-ordered process
Succession
Disparate shares (e.g., sons often get more)
Equal shares for sons and daughters
Polygamy
Permitted for some communities
Strictly prohibited for everyone

Cultural De-colonisation

This includes the integration of ancient Hindu sciences, philosophy and Indian-origin historical narratives into primary and higher education levels.

  • Changing the education model from Macaulay’s to the Bharatiya Gurukul Paddhati
    • Standardisation of traditional systems – Agencies like the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) are working in 2026 to harmonise traditional knowledge systems like Ayurveda with modern regulatory frameworks to build global trust in indigenous practices.

As we have seen until now, we Hindus have made good progress in reviving our rights, but there are many things still pending. Let us achieve all of them in a few more years.

I would like to conclude with another quote by Sita Ram Goel:

“Anything that has truth in it can never be destroyed.”

Bhuvananidhi, Student @ Vidyakshetra

Bhuvananidhi is a student of Agastya Varga. She is a very active student who loves to participate in all the activities at the Gurukula. Her natural flair to talk makes her a good presenter. She confidently speaks about topics in front of audience with her brilliant preparation and effort.